Theory vs. Practice
Diagnosis is not the end, but the beginning of practice.
Transhuman, AI, plagues, 5G/6G, wars, climate change, energy crisis, inflation – Cui bono?
In those troubled times people wonder what 'transhumanism' aims for, and what the motivations and pursued outcomes are. How comes you can watch forever the best experts give you "answers" – and still wonder what this is all about? Either they don't understand the matter – or they don't want you to understand it. In both cases, that explains why their painfully long and boring speeches lead nowhere.
In "The Island of Doctor Moreau" (1996), Marlon Brando plays the role of Dr. Moreau, a mad scientist who experiments on animals, using a wireless kill-switch he carries as a medal on his chest to guaranty his security.
He ends eaten by his creatures after they have found how to remove the implant (today either injected or absorbed with food) used to remotely inflict pain and even death if they dare to keep disobeying to direct orders.
Obligations range from having to accomplish a given task, or taboo violations like not accomplishing a mandatory task, entering forbidden areas, or even having forbidden thoughts.
So, instead of repeating what you can find everywhere else, we will focus on what nobody is telling you.
And this must start with a simple question: Cui Bono? (who benefits?)
Answering this question requires a bit of background history:
Since their early days, humans either build or steal – some occasionally, others for generations. As we all become what we do these populations became increasingly distinct (a fact confirmed in this video illustrating an academic experiment on rats).
- As building takes time and skills, stability matters: you must stay where you are so you have to treat your neighbors with respect – or risk banishment. Stealing wifes, children, land, water, harvests and tools is forbidden and sanctioned. Solidarity is strong because everyone will be unlucky, sick, old and then in need of others. Honors are given to the best contributors to society-at-large.
- As stealing is short-term (hit & fly away), instability matters: you must keep moving to avoid retaliation, and must be ready to kill and betray everyone (accusing innocents or even allies for your crimes) to avoid becoming a victim, often creating chaos to hide guilt. Unsurprisingly, the promise of solidarity among robbers is very fragile. Honors are given to the best contributors to robber-land.
Some robbers have progressively understood that they all shared basic needs:
- a safe remote place to store their bounty, and, sometimes, grow an offspring.
- advanced weapons supply, medical assistance, data about the best next target.
- powerful allies with a substantial (and therefore trustworthy) reason not to betray them.
- long-term deep-pocket buyers for the stolen objects that that they cannot store indefinitely.
- diversification: bribery, blackmail, corruption, subversion, sedition, mob incitement, terror, violence.
So robbers, unlike builders, had to create clandestine alliances to make their lifestyle survive and prosper. And, due to their (armed, guerrilla experts) capacity of nuisance and accumulation of stolen goods, robbers have been more in a situation to negotiate with kings than the undangerous population. That's how some pirates became privateers (pirates that promise to preserve the interests of a king and to attack his competitors or enemies – in exchange for shelters, medical assistance, weapons, and trade of the stolen goods).
These clandestine alliances are easy to spot: when people (politicians, journalists, lawyers, scientists, bloggers, influencers, industry leaders, billionaires, etc.) claim to oppose the official narratives (by attacking minor consequences and consolidating the big juicy root causes) but keep enjoying infinite funding and media exposure (instead of a merciless censorship), well, that's not what's happening to those that merely tell the truth (as a founder and former CEO of Microsoft, descendant of a Central Banker, has famously written: "cut them off the oxygen"). In this environment, money rewards only the co-conspirators.
It may come as a surprise after centuries of media cover-up but lies and secrecy are vital for deception: it's harder to steal someone if you tell your intentions upfront, and harder to get away with your bounty if your victims can identify and track you (hence a sane questioning when the narrative makes a sudden U-turn). But lies and secrecy are equally vital for the various robbers' accomplices that must keep a varnish of respectability to preserve their social status, influence on the population – and institutional ability to tax the builders.
Logically, the conspirators secretly advancing nefarious projects against the builder-society are the ones imposing a constant and full transparency (now called "regulatory compliance") to all others – because, to succeed, they have to make sure that nobody is understanding and disclosing their plan and even less preparing to make it fail.
This is not new: centuries ago, kings have established the "Cabinet Noir" was a government intelligence-gathering office, usually within a postal service, where correspondence between persons or entities was opened and read by government officials before being forwarded to its destination.
There is no other reason behind the censorship, disinformation and clandestine war against anyone providing "unconditional security" because, in contrast to the (ever-obsolete as ever-unsafe) U.S. NIST standards imposed to the world, it cannot be broken (if it is properly designed and implemented – without introducing vulnerabilities).
Wireless networks (Wi-Fi, 5G-6G, etc.) also have a passion for broken-by-design "secure" protocols, hierarchical topologies that facilitate clandestine interception enforced by the RF lossy wrong waves absorbed by physical obstacles, and for the only 1+ GHz frequencies that should not be used to preserve biology (even at very low power levels, our organs serve as 1-10 centimeters antennas, blood-vessels, cells and even molecules are sub-millimeter antennas, and the RF pulsed signals create very chronic measurable damage) ...despite all of these bad choices wasting energy and capital by requiring an otherwise pointless fragile and otherwise ever-obsolete and harmful infrastructure for the environment: (1+ GHz = microwave, 30+ GHz = millimeter wave)
|Below 3 Hz||> 105 km||N/A|
|3-30 Hz||105-104 km||Extremely low frequency||ELF|
|30-300 Hz||104-103 km||Super low frequency||SLF|
|300-3000 Hz||103-100 km||Ultra low frequency||ULF|
|3-30 kHz||100-10 km||Very low frequency||VLF|
|30-300 kHz||10-1 km||Low frequency||LF|
|300 kHz - 3 MHz||1 km - 100 m||Medium frequency||MF|
|3-30 MHz||100-10 m||High frequency||HF|
|30-300 MHz||10-1 m||Very high frequency||VHF|
|300 MHz - 3 GHz||1 m - 100 mm||Ultra high frequency||UHF|
|3-30 GHz||100-10 mm||Super high frequency||SHF|
|30-300 GHz||10-1 mm||Extremely high frequency||EHF|
|300 GHz - 3 THz||1 mm - 0.1 mm||Tremendously high frequency||THF|
6G goes further than 5G with directed energy beams by introducing small-distance 6G WET (Wireless Energy Transfers) "for the IoT to harvest environmental RF"... on the top of more precise
radar "sensing" capacity: "< 10 cm location and object recognition".
Radio-Frequencies (RF) absorption is maximum for oxygen at 60 GHz – the reason why 60 Ghz was used by the intelligence community for high security covert communications and by the military for satellite-to-satellite communications. For 60 Ghz beams, the earth's atmosphere acts like a shield preventing earth-based eavesdropping. This absorption weakens (attenuates) RF signals over distance, so that signals cannot travel far beyond their intended recipient.
As a result of RF absorption, link distances of millimeter-wave radios operating in the real world are limited by clouds, rain, snow, fog (bad weather – inconvenient for boats in distress calling for help) and physical obstacles (buildings, mountains) – especially metal (or other conductive materials like graphene at 26 GHz) or water (the main component of all animals and plants):
This alliance has led to a curious situation were, increasingly, in some of the richest countries, religions and the rule of law (the basis of living together) have slowly disintegrated to become the extreme opposite:
"Truth" and "good" have ceased to be related to reality, they became what those in power say – especially when they contradict themselves ("masks are useless", "masks are mandatory") and their contradictions are the proof of their power since every countries' authorities sing the exact same gospel at the same time (a few centuries ago, Central Banks and Press Agencies have been created at the same time by the same people – probably for a reason: controlling the narrative).
The rule of law has gradually enforced the nonsense, and sanctions (censorship, fines, bank accounts seizures, exclusion from the economic life, jail-time) are now imposed to the distracted or the rebel that, for the law, became an "enemy of the State", a "terrorist".
Here again, a word is employed at the opposite of its original meaning:
"Terrorist: person who supported or applied a policy of terror during the French Revolution".
And violating the Constitution based on the 1789 French Revolution (used to destroy the previous power) has become the new normality for Heads of States (eager to protect their own power):
- "Article 6. The Law is the expression of the general will"
- "Article 10. No one shall be molested for his opinions"
- "Article 11. The free communication of thoughts and opinions is one of the most precious human rights"
- "Article 14. All citizens have the right to ascertain the necessity of public contribution"
- "Article 15. Citizens shall have the right to call to account any Public Officer of its administration"
- "Article 16. Any society in which the guarantee of rights is not assured [...] has no Constitution"
When the power does not respect the rules it imposes to all others, its members (and the people watching them) are only animated by their least elevated common interests and most superficial desires (any resemblance with publicly-known people is not accidental).
This corruption of the institutions encourages cupidity: money lets the (many) least capable (hence the engineered fall of the education quality in rich countries) get what nobody would give them if they were not themselves lacking money (so money becomes the most desirable thing for the masses). And cupidity is vital for the private interests creating money out of thin air: as a matter of fact, if nobody wanted their electronic currency then their power would disappear overnight.
This is why, out of despair of seeing depositor savings shun their (ever-failing) 'protection', the bankers (former goldsmiths) have made the State endorse their fraud: instead of baring the signature of an ever-banrupt banker (issuing more certificates than it had deposits) banknotes ceased to be signed by bankers and received the guaranty of the State.
Then, after it became an institution, the scam (of private money creation) has grown exponentially to the point where only the State could be trusted to pay back debt – thanks to its monopoly on raising taxes and seizing properties when tax is not paid.
Unsurprisingly, the 1913 creation of the U.S. Federal Reserve Bank (FED) coincided with the permanence of the income tax (previously only raised in times of war): Congress added the 16th Amendment to the Constitution and the Revenue Act under which, individuals with income exceeding $3,000 were taxed at 1% – up to 7% for incomes exceeding $500,000.
And this wonderful system has been swiftly imposed all over the world and managed from a central power, the Swiss Bank for International Settlements (BIS) itself managed by an... American banker, Gates White McGarrah II (1863-1940). Since public debt interests were guaranteed by the taxpayer, it was only a matter of time for private bankers to expand this debt to a point where (a) it could not been paid back and therefore (b) legally transferred all public and taxpayer assets as a collateral guaranty at the benefit of private bankers while (c) securing forever the powers of the State (army, justice, police, education, science, pension-funds, health-care, etc.).
The ones talking best about this robbery of State powers were the ones in charge to defend them:
There are two ways to conquer and enslave a nation. One is the sword. The other is by debt.
If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency first by inflation then by deflation the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their Fathers conquered. I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people to whom it properly belongs.
War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes and armies. And debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. No nation could preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare.
I fear that foreign bankers with their tortuous tricks will entirely control the exuberant riches of America and use it systematically to corrupt modern civilization. They will not hesitate to plunge the whole world into wars and chaos in order that the earth should become their inheritance.
The credit system in all its phases should be merely a lubricant to the systems of production and distribution. It is not its function to control these systems.
[...] Clearly we must secure sound organization of our financial system as a prerequisite of the functioning of the whole economic system. [...] Democracy cannot survive unless it is master in its own house. The economic system cannot survive unless there are real restraints upon unbridled greed or dishonest reach for power.
We know now that Government by organized money is just as dangerous as Government by organized mob.
We have learned a lot of things about History at school – but strangely not what the Presidents of the most powerful nation in the world have depicted (during half a century, in graphic details) as the most severe threat to humanity... because schools and universities teach useless narratives that lead people to repeating the errors of the past. Cui bono?
If you think, that only social sciences, law, history and literature are hijacked, you did not pay attention. Think that mathematics and physics are free? Think again.
So, instead of promoting effort, courage and valuable contributions to society, only destructive selfish and superficial pleasures are promoted – to the extend of permitting what was forbidden in the past: "paedophilia is a 'sexual orientation' like being straight or gay" publicly claims a criminal psychologist in a country where schools teach more than 130 genders to children – all recognized by law... which is now proud to positively discriminate 55 of them (after having, for centuries, locked them down – to protect society!).
Reading, education, history, families, persons, identities and decency are old-fashioned, obsolete: everything that can denounce or help to understand the detrimental consequences of the destructive policies imposed to society must be banned – like selfless generosity, honesty and loyalty... because ignorant, isolated, decerebrated cupid people are much easier to manipulate and defeat.
New laws must pressure people even more, so that they are entirely absorbed by their survival and lack the time to think and organize themselves. Like if urgently becoming a Nation of thieves, drug-addicts, and child-molesters was a Noble goal. This is nothing more than a planned destruction of the society – and it must be recognized for what it is.
"Ordo ab Chaos" (the new order by chaos) – whatever it takes (because the victims are the builders, not the robbers who believe that they will rule over everyone else... by increasingly transforming themselves as useless bodies and minds: when robbing is your only skill, and the entire World is yours, you will die from inadequacy – the very definition of impotence).
According to the theory of "creative destruction" (an idea raised by Karl Marx, and later propagated by Austrian economist Joseph Schumpeter) economic and technological progress requires that firms die and industries and paradigms are swept away to make way for new ones.
But that's not what's happening:
- Film photography was replaced by numeric cameras, and this shift has traded quality for market-size... because the planned ubiquitous espionage could only exist if the old technology was removed from the market.
- Electric cars (used before petrol cars) "must" replace the polluting technology previously imposed to sustain the "petro-dollar". Since 2006 all new cars are surveillance tools. Air-quality is a scam: making and using batteries pollutes more than petrol engines (batteries need rare metals, must be periodically replaced, and suffer energy transmission losses and ever-increasing storage losses).
- the policies planning to impose the replacement of C (the dominant programming language for 50 years) by Java or .Net (inefficient hideous haystacks where to hide private ephemeral backdoors) are not a progress by any standard, that's an insult to intelligence.
Creative destruction is merely used to advance an agenda of destruction – to impose a world tyranny by the least capable.
That's how the Mafias and the States have built secret symbiotic alliances (merging assets and families to build interdependence and the stability they could not get in the society they are exploiting, robbing and killing), and why the people of power (legal or not) behave in so similar nefarious manner to publicly claim their status (at the opposite of the living-together values of the sedentary builders):
Since when has the world of computer software design been about what people want? This is a simple question of evolution. The day is quickly coming when every knee will bow down to a silicon fist, and you will all beg your binary gods for mercy.
As fragile as it has proved to be over time, the favorite technique of the greatest humanists and philanthropists is not especially new:
The people receive the religion, the laws, like the currency, without examining it. [...] God is a comedian playing to an audience too afraid to laugh.
Because, quoting again this great observer of human nature:
Man is free at the moment he wishes to be.
And it has found rare but inspired critics:
Don't give yourselves to brutes! Men who despise you, enslave you. Who regiment your lives. Tell you what to do, what to think, and what to feel. Who drill you, diet you, treat you like cattle, use you as cannon fodder. Don't give yourselves to these unnatural men, machine men with machine minds and machine hearts. You are not machines. You are not cattle. You are men. You have the love of humanity in your hearts. You don't hate. Only the unloved hate.
Today, the solitary inventor, tinkering in his shop, has been over shadowed by task forces of scientists in laboratories and testing fields. In the same fashion, the free university, historically the fountainhead of free ideas and scientific discovery, has experienced a revolution in the conduct of research. [...] The prospect of domination of the nation's scholars by Federal employment, project allocations, and the power of money is ever present and is gravely to be regarded.
But also a sharp analysis under the disguise of mere derision:
In the first place, God made idiots. That was for practice. Then he made school boards.
And serious warnings about its self-destructing consequences:
We should take care not to make the intellect our god; it has, of course, powerful muscles, but no personality.
Scams rely on misleading narratives – first to steal unsuspecting victims, and then to avoid sanctions.
The most successful narratives enslave most of the population – and at the same time protect the wrongdoers.
Since the pursued goal by robbers is to make their parasitic lifestyle sustainable, they have worked in collaboration with others to make the populations dependent on the system that feeds the robbers. As a result, the "critical infrastructure" and "public services": finance, energy, drinkable water, food production and distribution, transportation, telecoms, health-care, education, police, justice, defense, government administration, etc. must involve gargantuan deployment costs (that only a State can afford to pay) to exclude competition and to make enormous recurring profits:
"Officials are often loth to decentralise the power supply for fear of losing political control.
This is fraudulent when century-old solutions exist that cost a microscopic fraction of the involved tax paid by the whole society to a few dominant private interests. We have paid a premium for dangerous and polluting fossil/nuclear/solar/wind plants that need to be periodically replaced (at an horrendous cost).
A prominent investor specialized in the Energy sector wrote me:
"Professor thank you for your detailed explanation.
Unfortunately our world works based on money and to protect cash flow."
I then argued that, if the deployment and operating costs of a better alternative are negligible then the profit margins will be much higher – but the argument did not have any effect: why change something that works? Investors are making a fortune our of the Energy sector – and until things break (for them) they don't have any incentive to try something new.
Myopic, idiotic, soon destroyed by the power that they believe loves them. Power only loves power, it eats its own children. The only outcomes are fraud and destruction:
"ITER, The Grand Illusion", minute 47'16": "You are talking about cloud-cuckoo-land, are you not? Sorry Professor Cowley, I am addressing all three of you on this. It sems to me that what you have done is to invent a marvelous system where all the scientists working in this are manage to waste an enormous amount of money worldwide on a self-sustaining system with no likely outcome worth anything." – Baron Maurice Harry Peston, Member of the U.K. House of Lords
ITER (International Thermonuclear Experimental Reactor), a NUCLEAR FUSION GENERATOR claims to use 50 MW of energy to create 500 MW (a net x10 gain):
This would be a major leap as compared to the 100+ past attempts: the best achievement so far was 99% of losses.
Yet, with recurring delivery delays and ever-increasing budgets (from $18bn in 2006 to... $65bn in 2018), private bankers will surely enjoy to learn that ITER is the most expensive science experiment of all times (it's less certain for the taxpayer in charge of paying back these public loans guarantying a royal lifestyle for decades to armies of academics and private contractors... owned by private finance getting back the money (created out of thin air) twice – plus interests).
This documentary demonstrates (with ITER documents and ITER staff testimonials) is that ITER has never been expected to work as advertised:
Since day one, it was expected to FAIL: hence the already planned future reactors, despite the fact that ITER's built is not completed – and won't work if it is ever built.
Their goal is to collect funds with more projects do more "research" so that in 2070-2080, "maybe", this will work.
At this time all the involved researchers (and management) will be dead, saving them from the accusation of having conspired to steal taxpayer money, at the expense of other energy projects.
Others, like Global-WET.com with a 2014 fully-functional prototype (entirely funded by the involved company) have already demonstrated for a decade that they work as expected – and Global-WET has been presented at the Munich Security Conference (MSC 2019):
Badge, Bayerischer Hof, Munich Security Conference 2019
"The 55th Munich Security Conference (MSC 2019) took place from 15 to 17 February 2019 at the Hotel Bayerischer Hof in Munich. Among the 600 participants were heads of state and government from more than 35 countries, 50 foreign and 30 defence ministers, other representatives from the fields of politics, the military, the arms industry, business and science, as well as members of international intergovernmental and civil society organizations".
Finance and governments cannot pretend that they did not know about Global-WET, they have chosen to reject it – to preserve their power and revenues – at the expenses of everybody else.
Since the energy transmission losses (and the related waste and pollutions) can be removed completely with wireless energy transfers, the free and constant (day/night, winter/summer, sustainable) energy of ubiquitous volcanoes can be tapped all over the world:
And data can be wirelessly transmitted at the same time as energy – making big recurring saving since Telecoms are so energy-hungry. But low-cost ubiquitous mobility (electric cars, trains, tramways, planes) would also benefit – especially in countries that lack a critical infrastructure.
The only public-private pursued game is for private finance to racket the taxpayer with gigantic public expenses (financed by debt – that is, money created out of thin air by private finance) for illusory goals: the more new problems are artificially created (and then ignored) by the pseudo-solutions, the longer a scam will last and generate recurring revenues (dividends for private shareholders plus loan and compound interests paid back to private finance).
People are misled by those claiming that greed is the only motivation. Greed indeed motivates academia and the private sector – but since finance creates its own money (and buys every tangible asset it can in exchange for its electronic currency) the motivation is simply to bankrupt all governments and non-funded business to seize global power... while transferring the common public wealth into a few private pockets (unpayable debt imposes deployments of total violence to enable expropriation and land extraction).
That's why real-solutions MUST be excluded from the "free and open markets" (they are an existential threat to the scams).
Back to Dr. Moreau's Island – and its experiments mixing animal and human DNA (to enjoy a dumbed-down workforce):
Today's eye-wateringly expensive and fragile centralized infrastructure is the equivalent of the Dr. Moreau kill-switch: if things turn bad for the robbers and their institutional partners, by the press of a button, they can cut the supply of electricity which then stops the distribution of fuel, water and food. Within a few weeks, civilization is gone and 90% of the people will meet their creator (certainly stopping any chance for a revolt to succeed).
Even better, before launching the real thing, a simple warning can be delivered by limiting the affected region. The same technique has been used repeatedly with geo-engineering (already used in Vietnam during the war in the 60s) then first officially negotiated before being officially forbidden internationally in the 70s (yet still officially pursued to artificially generate what their victims and scientists explain is global-warming, earthquakes, tempests and tsunamis).
Despite all this official literature, gazillions of government-subsided media and government-agency (human and automated) agents spend taxpayer money to ridicule (official since internationally-forbidden) environmental warfare as 'tinfoil theories' and blame natural causes (a virus emerging from melting ice, a meteor, solar activity, Earth's core, etc.). Always eager to please for a fee, Hollywood is not shy of presenting these scenarios to prepare people's mind to such "accidental" events.
In this picture, transhumanism is the false promise of "power for all". It aims to augment only its sponsors (if this is ever made possible) – after having further enslaved the masses (a task that requires to massively diminish them – both in number and capacity).
What about AI (Artificial Intelligence)?
What is called "AI" today is not much different from what was called "AI" 30 years ago. The only novelty comes from the fact that, on the top of using a list of man-made rules and ready-to-use replies, these algorithms compile gargantuan numbers of statistic measures (to issue "predictive behavior" clues) and pick human behaviors (to merely copy & paste human capacity) from a large database of (illegally collected) human behaviors:
People bring their smartphone in the office, car, bathroom, bedroom, etc. without realizing that these devices have more than a dozen of sensors – including a high-resolution camera and microphone which are still active when the device is 'powered-down' (that's why the battery is not removable in recent smartphones).
So, today's so-called "AI" is neither 'artificial' (that's human behaviors selected by programs written by humans) nor even 'intelligence' (that's mere algorithms trying to match database records with an unresolved problem – like realistically making a 3D turtle talk and dance like a real person).
Why trying to abuse the public? Some large companies (and universities) need pretexts (immortality, patented miraculous cures, super-powers, etc.) to endlessly raise money – but pretending to have these capacities also impresses the masses – and may be handy if you need to distance yourself from a criminal behavior perpetrated by your organization: "it's not us, stupid, that's our AI".
Google has played this card many times when it was sued, invoking the super-secret page-rank algorithm to justify the fact that its own services, or the ones of advertisers, were ranking much higher than the more relevant ones bringing Google no revenues (despite the fact that it had also been proven that Google was manually altering its search results to promote itself and its sponsors).
Banks also, in the same circumstances, have blamed their High Frequency Trading (HFT) algorithms to avoid facing the consequences of their acts.
See the pattern? It's all about presenting (to complacent judicial authorities) a scapegoat that cannot be sanctioned – nobody can be blamed, it's just that the technology needs more funding to improve.
We've arranged a society on science and technology in which nobody understands anything about science and technology, and this combustible mixture of ignorance and power sooner or later is going to blow up in our faces. I mean, who is running the science and technology in a democracy if the people don't know anything about it?
There's no wonder why institutions and robbers are united in such a quest for unlimited power through deception: they are interdependent, they share a same and unique lifestyle and destiny.
The promise is that others will modify you to give you a longer life without illness and with more intellectual and physical capacities.
Yet, they are doing the very opposite: using mandatory injections to modify your metabolism so that every single cell of your body is attacking your most important organs (heart, brains, gonads)... after having disconnected your immune system.
They knew the outcomes before (a) forbidding the natural and cheap remedies preventing (b) the injections to become mandatory, and (c) forcing an ever-growing range of people to take the jab 3 years after the injection was publicly known for not protecting people against contagion nor sickness.
The promise was indeed "more power", right – but only for them, not for the masses.
To increase their power the powerful can either enhance themselves or, and that's much easier to do, degrade all others.
Few realize that, since 2019, the gains made by Big-Pharma have been dwarfed by the pension-funds gains: each time a middle-aged worker (or even better for them, a retired person) died, the money that has been collected for decades (to guaranty the corresponding retirement) stays in the pocket of the private insurer. People pay their whole life to get a pension because the law makes it mandatory – but if they die, the money is not their, it's not transfered to their inheritance – it's a net gift to finance.
Further, like wars, a financial crisis is just a massive transfer of wealth from the poor to the ultra-rich – and that's why we have so many: the geometric outcome is certain and risk-less for its beneficiaries (no banker went in jail in 2008, and it keeps working so well that failing banks are still bailed-out with the involuntary assistance of the taxpayer in 2023).
In comparison, if the few ultra-rich had to outperform all the poor then there would be not only incredible efforts to pursue for a lifetime (not exactly the lifestyle ultra-rich soft-belly tycoons are seeking) but also outcome uncertainties (they would be likely to lose, very often – and without recourse).
This makes it easier to understand the enthusiasm of the powerful to sponsor mass-murder and sterilization – at a profit since (broke) governments borrow from private banks to buy the 'fix' (from Big-Pharma owned by private finance getting its money back through dividends) – before these same governments then have to pay back the loan (plus the compound interests) to private finance (by seizing the assets of broke taxpayers).
Unsurprisingly, this exact same business-model was applied by the Robber-Baron (quoted earlier) for computers (sabotaged even before they are sold so that end-users could be spied, robbed, and their work sold to third-parties). When your ancestors have stolen the State privilege to extend the monetary base – and then imposed to the world the obligation for 'sovereign' States to borrow from private banks (instead of from their now lost own capacity to create money), your only goal in life is to extend public expenses as much as possible... while ensuring that the victims won't be able to protest (hence a constant flow of fresh money to reward the media, international bodies, and government officials for their silence and cooperation).
This difficult exercise has led some kings, the previous generation of mass-robbers, to lose their head – at the profit of the current generation of robbers – after the people had lost faith in the "divine nature" of the power that was enslaving and robbing them.
Hence the need for a new narrative now that most among us are disillusioned about the "free and open markets" narrative. The varnish of respectability did not last long, maybe because only the appearance of power changed (from a beheaded head to a less-at-risk rotating head), and the racket of the workers was the same.
The Pressing Need for the "Great Reset"
The French revolution was funded and controlled by the Protestant finance of the U.K. and Switzerland to replace the obsolete power of "divine right" by "private financial power". Replacing faith by greed introduced the notion of selfish self-interest (a strong motivation that can be trusted to last in armies of idiots seeking social status and undue honors) but, due to the violence of its success, it did not prove as sustainable as expected: the system is crumbling again under the weight of the abuses of its most enthusiastic supporters. Their number being much higher, the fall was just much quicker.
If hope has failed (of a remote 'better world' called Paradise vs. immediate 'better life' granted by wealth), what could work now?
"Totalitarianism: form of government and a political system that prohibits all opposition, outlaws individual and group opposition to the state and its claims, and exercises an extremely high if not complete degree of control and regulation over public and private life."
These acts, according to supreme-court lawyers, are still violating the constitution supposedly enforced by our governments (read the links above). But totalitarianism has the great advantage of not leaving things to the appreciation of anyone. It is imposed by a hidden elite to what it considers being its kingdom, affecting every single participant – including the corrupt and greedy middle-management used to hide who is in power.
That's what transhumanism promises to bring: your body and mind can be remotely controlled – with a kill-switch if people don't cooperate to this project of "making the masses own nothing – and enjoying it".
Liberty once lost is lost forever. When the People once surrender their share in the Legislature, and their Right of defending the Limitations upon the Government, and of resisting every Encroachment upon them, they can never regain it.
This is why transhumanism is so well funded (by the taxpayer, like everything else, but without asking it its opinion): many in power would like to traverse the current crisis unharmed... and bring their offspring in power for the eternity. Such level of stability can only exist if mankind loses most of its intellectual capacities.
As a CEO, an engineer and a father, I don't see any of that as an improvement. Guiding mankind and educating children cannot be done by robbing, raping and killing. Violence and destructions just lead to more violence and destructions. Beware what you wish for.
To explain their successes (of avoiding sanctions – either by killing their victims or neutralizing them through corrupted institutions), robbers often pretend that "lying requires more brain-power than merely building". This has long been proven false: young children with more ability to delay immediate rewards to get higher rewards (the builders rather than the robbers) are those making better lives (personal evolution, education, professional achievements, family stability and happiness, etc.):
Tricks and treachery are the practice of fools, that don't have brains enough to be honest.
If Global-WET had been deployed one century ago, we would have had no World Wars and everyone would still be peaceful today because ENERGY is vital – and that's the only asset able to support a large increase of the monetary mass (without impoverishing everyone but finance):
Only ENERGY can boost living standards and the economy (hence the historical increase of the monetary mass caused by new energy causing the industrial revolution). You can sit on tons of gold (or equity) in the desert – it won't let you get water and food, nor it will heat you, nor let you move or build something... but energy will let you do all that.
Creative Commons Source of financial charts: Wikipedia, ResearchGate.
Global-WET can do that for everybody – and at the same time remove pollution and waste – at a microscopic fraction of today's expenses ($200 billion have been committed by the U.S. federal government alone to promote "Net-Zero", cutting greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions to as close to zero as possible) an agenda pursued by:
- United Nations (UN),
- Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD),
- World Economic Forum (WEF),
- U.S. National Renewable Energy Laboratory (NREL),
- U.S. Department of Defense (DoD),
- U.S. Environmental and Protection Agency (EPA).
Whether or not CO2 should be a concern (and even worse, a unit of measure) pollution is very real and related to environmental damage – so all the World should unite to stop it.
But there's an even higher threat, neglected for too long:
To keep its value, money just has to be related to the amount of available energy.
Global-WET makes it possible to absorb today's monetary surpluses (unpayable debt) by deploying electrification in the unequiped parts of Africa and Asia (2 billion people), and new ground-breaking "Net-Zero" Wireless capacity in rich countries.
Will this just buy us time? Only if we let again finance grow faster than the real economy. Preventing this is trivial: tie the monetary-mass to the amount of available energy, worldwide. Global-WET can do it, globally.